Lol: xqc debate with an ex

Data Under lords is a computer strategy game from 2019, which incorporates the principle of chess with the heroes from the Data collection. It supports Crossly between the private systems as well as counts as one of the pioneers in the genre auto fight.

League of Legends is one of those games that thanks to their playability are very addictive and played by millions of people from all over the world. Genre Mob has the game of the game of Riot Games, although there is another title within this genre that has always been in the shade as the main competitor: Data 2. Each so often different players and fans of each side Fight and argue about what game is better and if one is more complicated and deep in their mechanics than another, etc. Well, this arduous verbal fight came to nothing more and nothing less than Felix QC level, the most seen twitch streamer versus Nathan Blaustoise Beau a former developer of the mob Riot Games.

xQc Reacts to Liberal Teens vs Conservative Parents | Middle Ground During his streaming on December 25, the two talked about different aspects that make each of these unique games. The developer of Riot Games had been criticizing Data 2 for his horrible design, also ensuring that people think that only because something makes the game harder, it does better. Overwatch's Educator did not want to stay silent and replied with a joke tone (although he was serious): Oh, stop talking man! You worked for Riot Games (...) League of Legends had as three objects and had to eliminate them because people could not activate them correctly.

Blaustoise would not be silent and respond with solid arguments: And how many are you playing actually endows compared to League? However, QC accused him of pulling popularity, but it is not just that, since as he affirms the ex-Riot employee, Data has the largest servers in the world because they are financed by crowdfunding, while the mob Riot Games has rather more stable servers than those of the Valve game. And you, who do you think he's right?

Comments